About 50 years ago I discovered ideas about reality that were so fantastic that all I wanted to do was share them with the world. So, I set out to do that. I spent decades planning how I would help humanity to avert the dark future and instead experience a heaven on earth unlike anything previously imagined. But instead of a warm welcome, something unspeakable happened that took me a long time to recover from.
I was sure that humanity would have embraced the new science I had discovered. I imagined that the world would be completely different in 50 years. But here I am 45 years later, and almost nothing has changed, but instead, humanity’s problems have grown far worse and the world seems headed toward the dark future.
PEN America, a free speech advocacy organization, identifies at least 50 different groups involved in local and state-level efforts to ban books. The wave of objecting to books has to do mostly with sexuality and LGBTQ people.
To me this sounds eerily familiar.
The book ban increase is due to a larger movement. Public objection to new ideas is always proportionate to the significance of what is resisted. In this case, cultural resistance is an attempt to defend a worldview in its last gasps before its death.
There is a revolution in thought taking place. Every time in history that this has happened, it has caused a cultural backlash in conservative thinking segments of the population.
During most of the 16th and 17th centuries, the Catholic Church persecuted scientists and forbade people from reading certain books. Nicholas Copernicus and Galileo Galileo had their books banned and Galileo was tried by the Inquisition. Both scientists held the same theory that the Earth revolved around the sun. The Church thought that Copernicus and Galileo were sinners because their ideas contradicted what was in the Bible.
The Inquisition wanted Galileo to publicly admit that he was wrong, and to perform religious penance while placed under house arrest.
Again, this sounds eerily familiar.
Anything that is contrary to collective assumptions is always initially resisted. That is why a conflict arose between the U.S. government and David Bohm. Bohm was arrested for refusing to testify against a colleague in a huge case that was hot air and inflamed passions. Bohm was eventually acquitted, but not soon enough. Despite Albert Einstein imploring Princeton to keep Bohm as a university professor at Princeton, Bohm was forced to leave the U.S.
The problems we face in the world today are symptoms. If we do not solve the underlying problem and change the world’s thinking, additional existential problems will continue to besiege us
This is a philosophy that gives the individual power over those who try to take the individual’s natural power away. Socrates received the death penalty for “corrupting the morals of the city youth in Athens.”
Again, this sounds eerily familiar.
Socrates did not survive because he didn’t have international philosophy.
Political, scientific, religious, educational, medical and economic forces in our society are telling you that there is something wrong with you. I am here to tell you that there is nothing wrong with you.
In the future, the transitional period of history we are in, will be known as “the barbaric age.”
NEVER use myths as your primary methods to achieve your goals!
Mainstream philosophy does not work because it is based on myths!
Rather than getting upset and letting another 50 yeas go by without change, I am going to do what I set out to do 50 years ago.
International Philosophy acquired its name due to its widespread international appeal. This is what the people of the world want. They do not want to be disempowered by myths any longer.
